I attended the Sudbury conference years ago. When they left the Sudbury model, did they change their conflict resolution process from the judicial committee? How do they do it now? It was interesting to see the community agreements. How is the law/rule making process look now? Do rules stay indefinitely until they are removed, leading to those expanding Sudbury rules books? Are is it more Agile style: try it, modify it, let it fall away or drop it? I'm quite curious what has changed from the original Sudbury model. I imagine the campus is just as stunning as ever, with that beautiful wood right there.
Thank you so much for reading and for your response. I wouldn't want to comment on these as we did not delve deeply into how it might have changed from the old model. So I don't want to misspeak. The process I saw in judiciary is a process I have been a part of have witnessed at other schools. The committee reviews the submissions, call the student in to go over it, the student has a chance to explain what happened and whether they agree. Then, they come to a resolution, mostly it's talking with the student about ways to resolve. For instance one was "when you're playing a running game agree to not go inside the building."
I attended the Sudbury conference years ago. When they left the Sudbury model, did they change their conflict resolution process from the judicial committee? How do they do it now? It was interesting to see the community agreements. How is the law/rule making process look now? Do rules stay indefinitely until they are removed, leading to those expanding Sudbury rules books? Are is it more Agile style: try it, modify it, let it fall away or drop it? I'm quite curious what has changed from the original Sudbury model. I imagine the campus is just as stunning as ever, with that beautiful wood right there.
Thank you so much for reading and for your response. I wouldn't want to comment on these as we did not delve deeply into how it might have changed from the old model. So I don't want to misspeak. The process I saw in judiciary is a process I have been a part of have witnessed at other schools. The committee reviews the submissions, call the student in to go over it, the student has a chance to explain what happened and whether they agree. Then, they come to a resolution, mostly it's talking with the student about ways to resolve. For instance one was "when you're playing a running game agree to not go inside the building."
The campus is incredible !